L’éducation des filles et la littérature de poupée au XIXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le recours aux jeux et aux jouets dans le cadre d’une éducation familiale se développe dès le XVIIe siècle. Mais ce sont surtout le XVIIIe et plus encore le XIXe siècle qui en généraliseront l’usage. La littérature de poupée qui est spécifiquement destinée aux filles est, de ce point de vue, exemplaire. Très abondante au point de devenir un genre littéraire, elle amuse des générations de fillettes et les modèle selon les normes morales, culturelles et sociales d’une société bourgeoise triomphante. Les nombreux épisodes et illustrations relatifs à l’éducation de la poupée par sa jeune maîtresse attestent ce détournement du jeu à des fins éducatives. De ce point de vue, la littérature de poupée qui se situe à la jonction de trois outils pédagogiques majeurs : le livre, le jouet et l’image, apparaît bien comme un objet culturel de l’enfance privilégiée, au service d’une éducation du genre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".