MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942856130 · doi:10.4000/books.purh.1749

L’éducation des filles et la littérature de poupée au XIXe siècle

2009· book-chapter· fr· W2942856130 on OpenAlexaff
Marie-Françoise Boyer-Vidal

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Rouen et du Havre eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le recours aux jeux et aux jouets dans le cadre d’une éducation familiale se développe dès le XVIIe siècle. Mais ce sont surtout le XVIIIe et plus encore le XIXe siècle qui en généraliseront l’usage. La littérature de poupée qui est spécifiquement destinée aux filles est, de ce point de vue, exemplaire. Très abondante au point de devenir un genre littéraire, elle amuse des générations de fillettes et les modèle selon les normes morales, culturelles et sociales d’une société bourgeoise triomphante. Les nombreux épisodes et illustrations relatifs à l’éducation de la poupée par sa jeune maîtresse attestent ce détournement du jeu à des fins éducatives. De ce point de vue, la littérature de poupée qui se situe à la jonction de trois outils pédagogiques majeurs : le livre, le jouet et l’image, apparaît bien comme un objet culturel de l’enfance privilégiée, au service d’une éducation du genre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Rouen et du Havre eBooksSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207