Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo busca demonstrar como a temática do corpo está presente em grande parte da obra de Foucault e recebe ênfases e desenvolvimentos diferentes conforme a perspectiva metodológica e o foco de suas pesquisas, nos campos do saber, do poder e da ética. No campo do saber médico, encontra-se a perspectiva de uma “anatomia patológica”, enquanto, no âmbito das relações de poder, constitui-se uma “anatomia política”. Já nos últimos volumes da História da sexualidade, o interesse de Foucault desloca-se das “técnicas disciplinares” para as “técnicas ou práticas de si”, desenvolvidas durante a Antiguidade grega e greco-latina. As perspectivas da “estética da existência” e do “cuidado de si” concedem importante lugar ao tema da relação com o corpo, na constituição ética do sujeito. Esse percurso na obra de Foucault atesta sua fidelidade ao que considera ser, por excelência, a atividade filosófica, na atualidade (um trabalho crítico do pensamento sobre o próprio pensamento).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".