Modeling and Performance Analysis of UAV-Assisted Vehicular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vehicular networks' connectivity and data delivery delay performance is highly affected by the vehicular traffic's spatio-temporal dynamics whose variations are subject to a multitude of random factors. Under the stringent and inevitable limitations imposed by free-flow vehicular traffic conditions (i.e., low-to-medium vehicular densities, elevated degree of mobility, high speeds, etc), these networks suffer from considerably rapid topology variations leading to severe connectivity intermittence and, hence, delayed data delivery. This motivates the study presented in this paper, which aims at investigating the capability of external elements that are independent of the vehicular traffic flow and its inherent limitations (e.g., airborne unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), a.k.a., drones) to serve as possible adjuvant relays; thus, contributing to strengthening/healing weak/broken communication links among ground-bound vehicular entities (i.e., RoadSide Units (RSUs) and vehicles) and uplifting the vehicular connectivity and delay performance. Particularly, in the context of a vehicular sub-networking scenario, a UAV mobility model is proposed as a first step in analytically capturing macroscopic dynamics for UAVs exhibiting waypoint mobility patterns and plying over a considered roadway segment. Then, a stochastic analytical model is formulated for the purpose of mathematically characterizing the path availability and achieved data delivery delays in the presence of these UAVs. A simulation framework is established to verify the validity and accuracy of the proposed models and gauge the merit of UAV assistance in improving the vehicular connectivity and data delivery delay performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".