MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942871070 · doi:10.4289/0013-8797.121.2.311

A New Combination in the Genus Bergicoris (Heteroptera: Rhyparochromidae: Myodochini), with Distributional Data for Some Species

2019· article· en· W2942871070 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pablo M. Dellapé, María Cecilia Melo

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHemiptera Insect Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeteropteraGenusGeographyBiologyEcologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Pseudocnemodus was erected by Barber (1911) to include the new species P. bruneri that was subsequently synonymized under P. canadensis (Provancher) by Van Duzee (1912). This species is distributed in eastern Canada and the United States (Ashlock and Slater 1988), and shows a unique stridulatory mechanism among the Myodochini (Harrington 1980), formed by a stridulitrum over the propleuron and lateral surface of the head, and a plectrum as a row of tubercles on the profemur. Brailovsky (1981) described the second species in the genus, P. martinezi, based on a single male from Paraguay with a stridulitrum over the propleura, but ‘visible only when a beam of intense light falls on it’. Brailovsky and Barrera (1984) noted the affinities between two Neotropical species of the genus Cnemodus Herrich-Schaeffer, C. albimaculus Berg and C. multifarius Berg, and P. martinezi, and pointed out that these three species represented a new genus. Dellape´ (2008, 2010) established the new genus Bergicoris to include B. albimaculus (Berg), B. multifarius (Berg), and the new species B. riojanus. Dellape´ (2008) also showed that the description and photograph of P. martinezi in Brailovsky’s (1981) paper indicated that it appeared to be congeneric with the species included in Bergicoris.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Entomological Society of WashingtonSame topicHemiptera Insect StudiesFrench-language works237,207