MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942968344 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2019.8702211

A Resource-Optimized VLSI Architecture for Patient-Specific Seizure Detection using Frontal-Lobe EEG

2019· article· en· W2942968344 on OpenAlexaff
Tianyu Zhan, Sam Guraya, Hossein Kassiri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyFrontal lobeComputer scienceVery-large-scale integrationEpilepsyArchitectureArtificial intelligenceEmbedded systemNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design, VLSI implementation, and experimental validation of a resource-optimized machine-learning algorithm for epilepsy seizure detection is presented. The algorithm uses only signals from the frontal and the front-temporal lobes EEG electrodes while yielding a seizure detection performance competitive to the standard full EEG systems. The experimental validations prove the possibility of conducting accurate seizure detection using quickly-mountable dry-electrode headsets without the need for uncomfortable/painful through-hair electrodes or adhesive material. The compact VLSI implementation of the algorithm is also presented and resource optimization techniques are discussed. The optimized implementation is uploaded on an Actel Igloo AGL250 low-power FPGA, requires 1237 logic elements, consumes 110μW dynamic power, and yields a detection latency of 10.2μs. The measurement results from the FPGA implementation on data from 23 patients (198 seizures in total) shows a seizure detection sensitivity and specificity of 92.5% and 80.1%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207