Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’appuie sur les archives d’Algérie conservées aux Archives nationales d’outre-mer. Dès 1908, le gouvernement général d’Algérie exerce une surveillance sur des indigènes et sur des chefs religieux soupçonnés de communisme, de panislamisme ou de velléités d’indépendance ; puis entrent en scène les partis nationalistes, et enfin les réseaux clandestins de rebelles de la guerre d’Algérie, après 1954.C’est la trajectoire du renseignement, et la vision des réseaux construite par les services de police, qui sont en question : comment l’information était-elle rassemblée, résumée, transmise et perçue aux niveaux supérieurs (préfet, gouverneur général, ministre) ? Portant sur les années 1930-1939 (Étoile nord-africaine, Parti du peuple algérien) et sur les années 1955-1958 (Front de libération nationale), cette étude souligne la forte surveillance qui s’exerçait en Algérie sur les séparatistes, et la parfaite information que recevait le gouvernement à Paris.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".