MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943065826 · doi:10.4000/books.cths.2478

Connaissance des réseaux « rebelles » en Algérie (1930-1958)

2017· book-chapter· fr· W2943065826 on OpenAlexaff
Isabelle Chiavassa

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article s’appuie sur les archives d’Algérie conservées aux Archives nationales d’outre-mer. Dès 1908, le gouvernement général d’Algérie exerce une surveillance sur des indigènes et sur des chefs religieux soupçonnés de communisme, de panislamisme ou de velléités d’indépendance ; puis entrent en scène les partis nationalistes, et enfin les réseaux clandestins de rebelles de la guerre d’Algérie, après 1954.C’est la trajectoire du renseignement, et la vision des réseaux construite par les services de police, qui sont en question : comment l’information était-elle rassemblée, résumée, transmise et perçue aux niveaux supérieurs (préfet, gouverneur général, ministre) ? Portant sur les années 1930-1939 (Étoile nord-africaine, Parti du peuple algérien) et sur les années 1955-1958 (Front de libération nationale), cette étude souligne la forte surveillance qui s’exerçait en Algérie sur les séparatistes, et la parfaite information que recevait le gouvernement à Paris.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0460.024
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooksSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207