MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PROGRAM FEATURES IN CHAMBER-INSTRUMENTAL ENSEMBLES BY ALEXANDER JACOBCHUK AS A COMPONENT OF COMPOSER’S STYLE

2015· article· en· W2943095606 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nadia Jacobchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicDiverse Scientific Research in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChamber musicPianoViolinArtStyle (visual arts)Composition (language)CelloLiteratureUkrainianMusicologyVisual artsFolkloreArt historyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article deals with the phenomenon of program chamber-instrumental music of the contemporary Ukrainian composer Alexander Jacobchuk. Program music as an aesthetical category is naturally connected with composer’s creativity and is a tangent to the problem of music understanding, because of this is actual for the musicology. Program music always was in a centre of researches of the Ukrainian musicologists, such as Mr. A. Mukha (he examined the specification principle of image content in music), Ms. L. Kiyanovska (she researched the music perception problem as well as the program functions), Ms. O. Frayt (she explored types of program music and the sources of composers inspiration). Alexander Jacobchuk made his own debut in chamber-instrumental genre as early as in student years. The Folk Scene (1972) was written for wood wind quartet. This composition, built on the themes of two Ukrainian folk songs, is the example of folklore program music (after classification of Ms. O. Frayt). Later in 2010, he wrote the trio Moonlight for violin, cello and piano, in which names of the movements (I – Moonbeams on lake Ontario, II – Niagara river at night, III – Moonrise in Muskoka) specified landscape images. for oboe and piano belongs to the same period of composer’s work (2012). The suite presents Alexander Jacobchuk’s program approach to the genre model of suite cycle. An oboe timbre is of great importance for understanding the image sphere of this composition because its wood wind sounding is very close to Portuguese folk wind instruments. In Portuguese folk music, wind instruments occupy a considerable place together with the local variety of classical guitar, castanets, concertino (a small harmonica). Among the most favourite and widespread – wind palheta shawn – a kind of a pan-pipe, traverse – familiar with a transversal flute, and also Galicia bagpipe – which looks like a scotch bagpipe. An oboe timbre description depends on the sounding register, on the ensemble content. For example, if oboe plays with piano – oboe sounds as concert solo instrument; but in case to play with piano, which imitates guitar accompaniment, oboe sounds differently. M. Rimsky-Korsakov, for the first time, gave a term space of expressive sounding, which determines that part of register, where the instrument sounds the better. In the suite, the most interesting episodes are where oboe plays solo cadences with oriental melody colour. The consists of three movements: I – Sailor’s dreams, which has lyric thoughtful character; on a quiet piano flow, reminding very light oscillation of waves, an oboe melody line, gradually activating, formed in emotionally expressive theme. This movement finishes with soft piano cluster. And exactly with this retained cluster attacca begins the II movement – Sailor’s Song, which by the romantic mood is close to fadu – Portuguese folk song genre. Piano chords in lower register are perceived as guitar accompaniment for oboe melody. Such imitation of guitar sounding is achieved by original piano effect – playing chords arpeggiato secco on a background of cluster. This bright effect, almost forgotten by modern composers, Alexander Jacobchuk used before in Prelude in gis (polyphonic cycle 12 Preludes and Fugues for piano, 1983). III movement – Sailor’s Dance, where the character of cheerful simple dance was created and where the piano chords, imitating sounding of string-nip instruments (mandolin, guitar), bring in the Mediterranian colour. In the for oboe and piano by A. Jacobchuk the program principle connected all three-movement composition in a strong cycle. The composer extended genre possibilities of program suite by revision of traditional contrast principles, offering own example: Largo – Lento con moto – Allegretto. for classical wind quintet (flute, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, French horn) was written by Alexander Jacobchuk in 2006; program music principle is also applied here. The suite cycle, consisting of three movements, starts from Andante non troppo Bells in Twilight, which draw a romantic gloomy time of desisting nature, watching for the night. Tender sounding of D by French horn pp with gradual adding the voices of bassoon, oboe, clarinet make the effect of pulsating space, like sounding of bell ringing. II movement – Tonight’s Dance has unique bright Spanish colour, where the composer used rhythmic basis of Spanish dance, but melodic material is original. III movement – Sounds at Midnight gives a sonore picture of night landscape. Refinement of rhythms, great cascade of expressive sound images cause the appearance of mysterious romantic Spain. The interesting sounding of this movement comes from changing solo episodes with ensemble playing, by correlation of melody and accompaniment (which sounds in higher register than the melody line), by pedal effects also. Thus, in author’s style of contemporary Ukrainian composer Alexander Jacobchuk program music plays an important role, forming the vivid system of suite cycle. for oboe and piano is the example of program music of pictorial type, where the program principle connects all composition to achieve integrity of the cycle. for the classical wind quintet presents the synthetic type of program principle: pictorial (gloomy landscape of the I movement), descriptive (III movement sounds of night time, bells from the I movement), folklore (rhythms of folk dance from the II movement).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts HeraldSame topicDiverse Scientific Research in UkraineFrench-language works237,207