MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SOSIALISASI MODEL KOLABORASI DALAM MANAJEMEN BENCANA ALAM DI KABUPATEN PANGANDARAN

2018· article· id· W2943151802 on OpenAlexaff
Asep Sumaryana, Sawitri Budi Utami, Ramadhan Pancasilawan

Bibliographic record

VenueDharmakarya · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salah satu wilayah di Kabupaten pangandaran yang berpotensi terjadi bencana-bencana alam seperti yang telah disebutkan adalah Kecamatan Kalipucang, Dengan kondisi wilayah yang rentan terhadap bencana serta dampak-dampak yang ditimbulkan dari bencana membutuhkan perhatian untuk upaya pengurangan risiko bencana. Salah satunya adalah melalui sosialisasi tentang kebencanaan dan juga hal-hal yang harus dilakukan ketika terjadi bencana alam. Maka dari itu dalam kegiatan PPM yang dilaksanakan berupa kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat di Kabupaten Pangandaran dengan berkolaborasi bersama Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD) Kabupaten Pangandaran melalui program Wisata Edukasi Bencana Goes to School (WEB GTS) yang kemudian kegiatan ini merupakan salah satu perwujudan dari Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi yaitu pengabdian masyarakat. kegiatan PPM adalah dengan melakukan kegiatan yang terbagi dua yaitu berupa sosilisasi di BPBD kemudian sosialisasi kepada sekolah. Sosilisasi ini dalam yang diawali terlebih dahulu dengan pemberian materi, kemudian diskusi, dan praktik. Kegiatan dipandu oleh narasumber (tenaga Ahli) sebagai fasilitator pelatihan dan dibantu dengan seperangkat alat untuk melakukan simulasi secara langsung.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDharmakaryaSame topicEdcuational Technology SystemsFrench-language works237,207