MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943227113 · doi:10.5539/jas.v11n6p292

Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Climatological Variables in the Aid of Decision Making for Irrigated Agriculture

2019· article· en· W2943227113 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roberto Filgueiras, Matheus Mendes Reis, Érika M. G. Lopes, Rayssa Balieiro Ribeiro, Maria Camila Alves Ramos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and biological studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsEvapotranspirationContext (archaeology)KrigingEnvironmental scienceIrrigationAgricultureVariogramHydrology (agriculture)MeteorologyGeographyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The knowledge of the spatial-temporal dynamics of evapotranspiration is of great importance for the accomplishment of agroclimatic zoning and, therefore, for the design of irrigation systems and management of water use in irrigated perimeters. In this context, this study aimed to generate, with the aid of geotechnologies, information that can support irrigation systems planning and design, based on the temporal distribution of daily climatological normals and on evapotranspiration mapping for the irrigated perimeter of Gorutuba/MG. Climatic data were obtained from the meteorological station of the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET) of the municipality of Janaúba/MG in the period from 1985 to 2014. It was verified the non-tendentiousness and the temporal dependence of the climate data using variogram analysis and the temporal dependence index, respectively. For the interpolation, it was used ordinary kriging. The evapotranspiration mapping was conducted from 180 monthly images, from 2000 to 2014, of the MODIS sensor MOD16A product. The results generated for the irrigated perimeter provided relevant information for decision making of the irrigated agriculture management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicEnvironmental and biological studiesFrench-language works237,207