MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943238375 · doi:10.1109/skg.2018.00050

Toward Semantic Social Network Analysis for Business Big Data

2018· article· en· W2943238375 on OpenAlexaff
Weichang Du

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBig dataSemantics (computer science)Data scienceSocial network analysisStock tradingStock (firearms)Business analysisStock marketData miningBusiness modelWorld Wide WebBusinessSocial mediaMarketingProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper first presents results of our three recent research projects on using social network analysis (SNA) techniques to analyze business big data involving stock data, trading data, and business contract data. The analysis on historical stock data identifies alternative representative indexing stock groups. The analysis on high frequency trading data establishes new algorithms for more effective high frequency trading. The analysis on business contract networks studies relationships between companies' contracts and their performance in profits and stock levels. The paper then discusses approaches to incorporating explicit semantics into conventional social networks and extending standard social network analysis techniques to more effective semantics-based analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.098 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207