Interfacial instabilities of immiscible non-Newtonian radial displacements in porous media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immiscible flows that involve radial displacements of shear-thinning or shear-thickening fluids by a Newtonian fluid in a homogeneous porous medium are modeled numerically. The interfacial instabilities are tracked in time for different values of the rheological parameters, namely, the Deborah number (De) and the power-law index (n), and are characterized through the effective number of fingers and the finger area density. The results of the study reveal that the effects of these two parameters on the instability are not monotonic, and it is found that the flow is least unstable for some critical value of either De or n. The dependence of these critical values, in particular, on the mobility ratio (M) and capillary number (Ca) is analyzed. It is found that when all other parameters are fixed, the critical Deborah number (Dec) increases as the power-law index increases in shear-thinning fluids or decreases in shear-thickening ones. Similarly, the critical power-law index (nc) increases with increasing (decreasing) Deborah number in shear-thinning (shear-thickening) flows. Furthermore, both critical parameters are found to vary monotonically with the mobility ratio, with the dependence most noticeable at small values of M. Their variation with the capillary number is however nonmonotonic reaching an extremum at an intermediate value of Ca. An examination of the rate of shear strain at the interface reveals that it consistently shows the smoothest variation and the smallest average value at the critical parameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".