MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943337529 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v20i1.312

Announcement Effects of Macro Economic Variables on Stock Market Returns and Volatility- A Neural Network Approach

2018· article· en· W2943337529 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ohannes George Paskelian, Stephen Bell, Julia Creek

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicStock Market Forecasting Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkVolatility (finance)EconometricsEconomicsStock marketStock (firearms)MacroUnemploymentFinancial economicsComputer scienceMacroeconomicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the effects of macroeconomic variables on stock returns and volatility using a Neural Network approach. Neural network models can discover nonlinear complex patterns with the ability to process high levels of data. Neural networks can be used for any type of similar data sets with the ability to process and uncover similar data patterns, and provide a result. In this paper, we use a learning neural network model to find the relationship and strength of six widely used macroeconomic variables on stock market returns and volatility. Results indicate the three most influential variables are announcements of inflation, unemployment, and national income.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicStock Market Forecasting MethodsFrench-language works237,207