Bibliographic record
Abstract
La propriété immobilière est recherchée pour la valeur de garantie qu’elle accorde à un créancier sous forme d’une hypothèque immobilière conventionnelle. Une approche comparative des systèmes de droit qui nous sont familiers permet les rapprochements suivants : le droit français transforma l’hypothèque générale et secrète en une sûreté spéciale et publique; la common law effectue plutôt un transfert du titre soumis à un droit de rachat; le droit québécois, d’abord semblable au droit français de la même époque, fit de nombreux emprunts au droit anglais, principalement l’exigence de la publicité. De plus, les droits accordés conventionnellement au créancier, spécialement la clause de dation en paiement, s’inspirent plus de la conception anglaise. La réforme du droit québécois maintient les règles de fond et de forme que nous connaissons, en les adaptant aux réalités modernes sauf quant au caractère solennel du contrat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".