Les loups-garous devant la justice (xvie-xviie siècle) : l’hybridité comme mobile du crime « inhumain »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On peut considérer les procès de lycanthropes comme des cas particuliers de procès de sorcellerie. La question de la transformation d’un homme en loup rencontre cependant des contradictions, tant sous l’angle théologique que philosophique. De plus, depuis Marcellus de Side, la lycanthropie est plutôt considérée comme un dérèglement des « humeurs » et une manifestation d’un état mélancolique. Si l’on se place du point de vue criminologique, on peut distinguer plusieurs situations : procès en sorcellerie contaminés par la recrudescence parallèle des attaques de loups prédateurs, manifestation de lycanthropie clinique, homicides que l’on attribuerait aujourd’hui à des tueurs en série désorganisés. À crime « inhumain », il faut la figure d’un criminel « inhumain », mi-homme, mi-bête.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".