Internodular functional connectivity in heterotopia‐related epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective A vast network involving the nodules and overlying cortices is believed to be responsible for the epileptogenicity in gray matter heterotopia with multiple nodules, which often associated with difficult‐to‐treat epilepsy. We sought to determine if functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) could detect internodular functional connectivity (FC), and if this connectivity reflects an actual synchronized neuronal activity and partakes in epileptogenicity. Methods We studied 16 epilepsy patients with multiple heterotopic nodules; eight underwent subsequent intracerebral EEG. We examined the internodular FC using fMRI and its correspondence with internodular synchrony of intracerebral interictal activity. We then compared the spreading speed of ictal activity between connected and unconnected nodules; and the FC among possible combinations of nodule pairs in terms of their involvement at seizure onset. Results Seventy nodules were studied: 83% have significant connection to at least one other nodule. Among the 49 pairs studied with intracerebral EEG, (1) synchronized interictal activity is more prevalent in fMRI‐connected pairs (P < 0.05), (2) ictal activity spreads faster between connected pairs (P < 0.0001), and (3) stronger FC was observed between pairs in which both nodules were involved at seizure onset (P < 0.01). Interpretation fMRI could reliably and noninvasively detect the FC between heterotopic nodules. These functional connections correspond to the synchrony of interictal epileptic activity between the nodules and to the ability of nodules to generate synchronous seizure onsets or rapid seizure spread. These findings may help in understanding the complexity of the epileptogenic network in multiple heterotopic nodules and better targeting the likely epileptogenic nodules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".