MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Alfred Binet, les rayons X et les spirites.

2017· article· fr· W2943469376 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Klein

Bibliographic record

VenueÉduquer · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldChemistry
TopicHistory and advancements in chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 8 novembre 1895, Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen (1845-1923), professeur de physique à l’université de Würzburg en Allemagne, prépare dans son laboratoire un nouveau dispositif expérimental pour l’étude de ces rayons cathodiques récemment mis en évidence par son compatriote Johan Wilhelm Hittorf (1824-1914). Il recouvre son tube de Crookes - une ampoule remplie d’un gaz à basse pression - d’un carton noir et active la bobine de Ruhmkorf qui y est raccordée pour y faire passer un fort courant électr...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉduquerSame topicHistory and advancements in chemistryFrench-language works237,207