Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les circonstances historiques de l’introduction de l’injonction en droit québécois en ont rendu l’usage difficile comme voie d’exécution forcée des obligations de faire à cause de l’influence pertubatrice des règles de common law. Il s’agit cependant de la seule procédure générale dont les juges disposent à cette fin. L’exécution en nature, pourtant prévue par le Code civil , n’a donc pu s’imposer que très partiellement. Les tribunaux ont cependant commencé à se dégager des approches restrictives antérieures en accordant des injonctions obligeant à respecter des engagements commerciaux complexes. Mais l’interférence des règles anglaises persiste et rend difficile la création d’une jurisprudence claire. Pour y parvenir, il est proposé de dissocier l’injonction de l’outrage au tribunal qui pourrait être remplacé par une sanction civile. La spécificité de l’injonction québécoise comme procédure d’exécution forcée serait alors plus affirmée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".