MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943542431 · doi:10.1136/emermed-2019-208626

Emergency evaluation for possible papilloedema

2019· article· en· W2943542431 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Micieli, Jonathan A. Micieli

Bibliographic record

VenueEmergency Medicine Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsKensington HealthToronto Western HospitalSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeadachesNauseaVisual acuityOptometryPapilledemaOphthalmologyNeurological examinationEmergency departmentSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 25-year-old woman presented to the emergency room for an urgent evaluation after she was noted to have possible bilateral optic disc oedema by her optometrist. She went to see this optometrist to update her glasses prescription. She denied headaches, nausea, vision changes or any other neurological symptoms. Visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes and confrontation visual fields were full. Funduscopic examination and a CT scan of the head were performed to rule out an intracranial mass and …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmergency Medicine JournalSame topicCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207