MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943575305

Measuring transitional matrix elements using first-order perturbation theory in Coulomb excitation

2019· article· en· W2943575305 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Masango

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of the Western Cape Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of the Western Cape) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcited statePhysicsAtomic physicsCoulomb excitationExcitationAngular momentumProjectileGround stateCoulombNeutronPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Nuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsElectron
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The low-energy structure of the stable light nucleus 20 Ne has been examined using Coulomb excitation at the TRIUMF ISAC-II Facility in Vancouver, Canada.The highly-efficient and segmented TIGRESS HPGe gamma-ray array has permitted an accurate Coulomb-excitation study of the first excited-state state, 2 + 1 , at 1.634 MeV in 20 Ne.Beams of 20 Ne 5 + with approximately 1.7 × 10 7 ions/s were accelerated to 3.235 MeV/u and bombarded onto a 1.56 mg/cm 2 110 Pd target.Six TIGRESS HPGe clover detectors covering approximately 19% of 4πwere used to detect the gamma rays emitted in the de-excitation of the levels populated in the beam and target nuclei, while scattered ions were detected using annular double-sided, CD-type silicon detector.The angular coverage of the silicon detector at forward angles allows for a clean measurement of transitional matrix elements without second-order effects arising from the static quadrupole moment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of the Western Cape Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of the Western Cape)Same topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207