MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943604635 · doi:10.4000/books.enc.1152

La bibliothèque de la commission des Monuments historiques en 1875 : bibliothèque du patrimoine ou d’architecture ?

2002· book-chapter· fr· W2943604635 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Daniel Pariset

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications de l’École nationale des chartes eBooks · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bibliothèque du patrimoine ou d’architecture ? Ce problème d’actualité en raison de la rénovation du palais de Chaillot et de la création, dans la Cité de l’Architecture et du Patrimoine, d’une bibliothèque publique d’information et d’actualité, s’avère aussi un problème historique complexe, tant l’histoire des bibliothèques, c’est-à-dire des sources imprimées qui forment un savoir et une culture, reste, à ce jour, mal connue, comme le montre ce colloque.Comment se constitue un savoir ? D’où...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0060.013
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications de l’École nationale des chartes eBooksSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207