MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943614222 · doi:10.21037/qims.2019.04.07

Quantification of plaque characteristics detected by dual source computed tomography angiography to predict myocardial ischemia as assessed by single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging

2019· article· en· W2943614222 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ting Liu, Xue Yuan, Congcong Wang, Mingfei Sun, Shiqi Jin, Xu Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial perfusion imagingCoronary artery diseaseComputed tomography angiographySingle-photon emission computed tomographyPerfusionAngiographyRadiologyVulnerable plaqueTomographyNuclear medicineEmission computed tomographyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: We aim to evaluate the relationship between quantitative plaque characteristics detected by dual-source computed tomography angiography (DSCTA) and myocardial ischemia as assessed by single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). METHODS: In this study, 460 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent DSCTA and stress/rest SPECT-MPI, and 179 patients with coronary artery plaques were quantitatively analyzed. Quantitative coronary artery plaque measurements including total plaque volume, the volume of non-calcified plaque, calcified plaque volume, low-density noncalcified plaque volume, total plaque burden, calcified plaque burden, non-calcified plaque burden, low-density non-calcified plaque (LDNCP) burden, remodeling index, plaque length, maximum diameter stenosis were provided by the automated software (Release 5.6.5, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Canada). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between quantitative plaque characteristics and myocardial ischemia to determine if plaque characteristics were independent of clinical risk factors and significant CAD. RESULTS: 12.9% (6.5-18.5), P=0.011]. In a multivariate analysis, low-density noncalcified plaque burden (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.16-1.53, P<0.001) remained a significant predictor of myocardial ischemia after adjusting for stenosis ≥50% and gender. The area under curve (AUC) of the model containing LDNCP burden, stenosis ≥50% and gender was 0.875 (95% CI, 0.812-0.938), which was significantly better than the model with stenosis ≥50% and gender (AUC 0.729; 95% CI, 0.633-0.825). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative plaque characteristics detected by DSCTA are independently correlated with the incidence of myocardial ischemia by SPECT-MPI in patients with suspected CAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantitative Imaging in Medicine and SurgerySame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207