Crowd Management: The Overlooked Component of Smart Transportation Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Governmental, scientific, and industrial initiatives are developing a new era of smart transportation systems, ambitiously aimed at overcoming the limitations of current transportation infrastructures. These initiatives are designed to cooperate safer, efficient, eco-friendly, and enjoyable transportation for people and goods in large urban areas. However, current research on smart transportation systems has neglected a fundamental building block: smart crowd management. In a smart transportation system, the smart crowd management component will be demanded for identifying and controlling the congestion that can occur during commutes and routine travel. In this article, we discuss the incompleteness of current smart transportation system initiatives as they are not implementing a smart crowd management component. Moreover, we identify and discuss the basic steps for the design of solutions for smart crowd management, as well as the main challenges that must be addressed. Finally, we provide future research directions for the design of smart crowd management solutions and infrastructures for smart transportation systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it