What Women’s Spaces? Women in Australian, British, Canadian and US Suburbs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Women, families, and suburbia: for more than one hundred years the three have been intertwined in Australia, Britain, Canada, and the United States. Suburbs exist in that critical fluid region between city centres and rural spaces. While individual suburbs may change remarkably over time and range widely in their specifics, their quintessential representation identifies them as low-density, familycentred residential spaces, sometimes revealingly characterized as ‘bedroom’ or ‘dormitory’ communities. Although differentiated in many ways across the four countries, such imagined suburbs lie at the heart of many discourses about modernity, forecasting either national promise or nightmare. Women and their work, or, more broadly, gender relations haunt the majority of these accounts. However, sustained deconstruction of the ‘taken-for-granted’ association between women and ‘the family’ within residential suburbs had to await the arrival of feminist scholars in the late-twentieth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it