Dinámicas de dominación y sumisión en Perra brava de Orfa Alarcón
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo analiza la relación de sumisión y dominación consensual entre Fernanda y el narcotraficante Julio, en la novela Perra Brava (2010) de la autora mexicana Orfa Alarcón. El marco teórico se basa en los estudios de Andrea Beckmann, Staci Newmahr y Margot Weiss sobre el BDSM consensual, así como en la dialéctica del señor y el esclavo de Friedrich Nietzsche. El artículo examina cómo la relación entre Fernanda y Julio cambia cuando Julio modifica su actitud hacia Fernanda. Se propone que cuando Julio reconoce que Fernanda posee valores éticos similares a los suyo, él comienza a tratarla como su igual, es decir, como un superior. Debido a esto, la posición de inferior absoluto que Fernanda tenía se transforma. Sin embargo, aún cuando los papeles de los dos personajes se modifican, nunca se invierten. Su relación representa deseos y afectos complejos, así como historias personales que reflejan y critican dinámicas de género y poder en el mundo del tráfico de drogas en México.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".