La Loi canadienne sur la responsabilité civile nucléaire et les tendances du droit nucléaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le développement industriel de l’énergie nucléaire a requis, dès le départ, une législation exorbitante du droit commun en matière de responsabilité civile. Le régime qui a été élaboré et mis en place tant dans le cadre international qu’au sein des juridictions nationales se caractérise par une responsabilité objective, sans faute, canalisée — juridiquement ou économiquement — sur l’exploitant nucléaire et dont le montant est plafonné; de même que la durée d’une telle responsabilité est limitée dans le temps selon la nature du dommage invoqué. Les raisons d’être économiques du régime de responsabilité civile nucléaire sont mises en cause par certains groupes environnementalistes devant les tribunaux canadiens. Cet article cherche à éclairer la réflexion sur la question en comparant certaines législations nationales (Canada, États-Unis, France) et les Conventions internationales (Convention de Paris et Convention de Vienne) dans ce domaine particulier du droit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".