MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943836654 · doi:10.1002/mgg3.724

The Enamel Phenotype in Homozygous <i>Fam83h</i> Truncation Mice

2019· article· en· W2943836654 on OpenAlexaff
Shih‐Kai Wang, Yuanyuan Hu, Charles E. Smith, Jie Yang, Chunhua Zeng, Jung‐Wook Kim, Jan C.‐C. Hu, James P. Simmer

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Taiwan University HospitalNational Research FoundationNational Taiwan UniversityNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Science and Technology
KeywordsEnamel paintAmeloblastAmelogenesis imperfectaAmelogenesisAmelogeninMolarEnamel organBiologyPhenotypeAnatomyInternal medicineCell biologyEndocrinologyDentistryMedicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Truncation FAM83H mutations cause human autosomal dominant hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta (ADHCAI), an inherited disorder characterized by severe hardness defects in dental enamel. No enamel defects were observed in Fam83h null mice suggesting that Fam83h truncation mice would better replicate human mutations. Methods We generated and characterized a mouse model ( Fam83h Tr/Tr ) expressing a truncated FAM83H protein (amino acids 1–296), which recapitulated the ADHCAI‐causing human FAM83H p.Tyr297* mutation. Results Day 14 and 7‐week Fam83h Tr/Tr molars exhibited rough enamel surfaces and slender cusps resulting from hypoplastic enamel defects. The lateral third of the Fam83h Tr/Tr incisor enamel layer was thinner, with surface roughness and altered enamel rod orientation, suggesting disturbed enamel matrix secretion. Regular electron density in mandibular incisor enamel indicated normal enamel maturation. Only mildly increased posteruption attrition of Fam83h Tr/Tr molar enamel was observed at 7‐weeks. Histologically, the Fam83h Tr/Tr enamel organ, including ameloblasts, and enamel matrices at sequential stages of amelogenesis exhibited comparable morphology without overt abnormalities, except irregular and less evident ameloblast Tomes' processes in specific areas. Conclusions Considering Fam83h −/− mice showed no enamel phenotype, while Fam83h Tr/Tr (p.Tyr297*) mice displayed obvious enamel malformations, we conclude that FAM83H truncation mutations causing ADHCAI in humans disturb amelogenesis through a neomorphic mechanism, rather than haploinsufficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Genetics & Genomic MedicineSame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207