MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943838479 · doi:10.5962/p.266523

Cost-effectiveness of Philippine butterfly species used in live exhibits: an assessment of longevity, encounter rate and behaviour

2009· article· en· W2943838479 on OpenAlexaff
Laura J Robson, Adrienne Brewster, Gard W. Otis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research on the Lepidoptera · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAnimal and Plant Science Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphSystems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLongevityButterflyEcologyFisheryBiologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importation of pupae represents a major cost for live butterfly exhibitors. Because captive butterfly species differ in life history characteristics, they should also differ in their value to exhibitors. Ten species of Philippine butterflies were inijtorted to Wings of Paradise Butterfly Conservatory. Butterflies were marked upon emergence as adults and were then released into the conserv'ator)'. Recaptures occurred three times daily, two to five times per week, from mid jtily to September, 2006. Using maximum likelihood estimation, we determined mean species longevity, encounter rate and behaviour suitability for nine of the ten butterfly species. All species demonstrated time-and age-independent survival rates. Species were found to differ significantly in longevity, encounter rate and behaviour suitability under exhibit conditions. Using the data and methodology of this study, exhibitors may select species to im|tort based itpon their relative cost-effectiveness and performatice value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Research on the LepidopteraSame topicAnimal and Plant Science EducationFrench-language works237,207