MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943861911

Island Mentality: Mapping “de globality ov it all” between Jamaica, England, and Australia in Maxine Beneba Clarke’s “Big Islan”

2018· article· en· W2943861911 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ruth McHugh-Dillon

Bibliographic record

VenuePostcolonial text · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalityColonialismContext (archaeology)HistoryAmbivalenceWhite (mutation)NarrativeArchipelagoCaribbean literatureCaribbean artGlobalizationArt historyEthnologySociologyAnthropologyLiteratureArtArchaeologyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maxine Beneba Clarke’s story “Big Islan,” from her collection Foreign Soil (2014), charts unexpected Australian-Caribbean connections, exploring colonialism, globalisation and “island mentalities.” Subverting three colonial institutions (language, map-making, cricket), Clarke reveals ambivalent, decolonising potential in celebrating Caribbean experience. Patois narration focalises Caribbean reality and Nathanial Robinson’s beloved home, 1960s Kingston, which he considers centre of “de globality ov it all”. However, the West Indies’ celebrated “Calypso Summer” cricket tour of Australia makes Nathanial restless and he considers leaving his “small-tiny islan” for the island-continent where Black men are “kings”. Clarke ironically exposes the story’s historical context: terra nullius and the White Australia Policy. The reader maps apparently disparate but actually deeply connected histories, participating in story-telling’s “total expression” (Brathwaite). The coordinates are set by Clarke, who constructs a literary archipelago of islands; a counternarrative to colonial/multiculturalist belonging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.015
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePostcolonial textSame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207