Abstract GS6-06: Local therapy and quality of life outcomes in young women with breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Increasing rates of mastectomy, primarily bilateral mastectomy (BMx), have been most dramatic in young women with breast cancer (BC). Impact on long-term quality of life (QOL) is largely unknown. Methods: Between 10/2016-11/2017, we administered the BREAST-Q, a validated patient-reported outcomes measure, to women dx with BC at age ≤40 in a large prospective cohort study. Demographic and treatment information was obtained by surveys and chart review. Mean BREAST-Q scores for each domain (breast satisfaction, physical, psychosocial, and sexual) were compared by surgery types; higher BREAST-Q scores (range: 0-100) indicate better QOL. Linear regression was used to identify predictors of BREAST-Q domain scores. Results: 581 women with stage 0-3 BC completed the BREAST-Q a median of 5.8 years from dx. Median age at dx was 37 (range: 26-40) years; 86% had stage 0, 1 or 2 disease; 28% had breast-conserving surgery (BCS); 72% had mastectomy (Mx), among whom 72% underwent BMx and 89% had reconstruction. Mean BREAST-Q scores (unadjusted) for breast satisfaction, psychosocial, and sexual well-being were lower for patients having unilateral mastectomy (UMx) or BMx compared to BCS; physical function was similar among groups. In multivariate analysis, lower BREAST-Q psychosocial scores were associated with radiation and Mx (UMx or BMx). Lower sexual well-being scores were also associated with Mx. Lower satisfaction with breast scores following radiation were of a clinically significant magnitude (β -8.1 95% CI -11.9- -4.3, p-value 0.03). Lower scores for physical well-being were seen for patients reporting lymphedema and higher for those who had undergone surgery more than 5 years prior. Lower scores across all 4 domains were associated with reported financial distress. BREAST-Q domain mean scores (SD) BMxUMxBCSp-valueBreast satisfaction60.3 (18.9)59.5 (21.3)65.9 (20.7)0.008Physical well-being78.6 (14.9)79.7 (15.1)78.9 (15.5)0.8Psychosocial well-being68.1 (20.8)70.5 (21.2)76.1 (20.5)<0.001Sexual well-being48.6 (21.3)53.2 (21.7)57.5 (18.7)<0.001SD Standard deviation Conclusion: Local therapy in young breast cancer survivors may have a persistent impact on their breast satisfaction, psychosocial, and sexual outcomes, with particular effects from UMx or BMx. Socio-economic stressors also appear to play a role. When counseling young women about their surgical decisions, knowledge of potential long-term QOL impact is of critical importance. Citation Format: Dominici LS, Hu J, King TA, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Local therapy and quality of life outcomes in young women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-06.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".