MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943884623 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2018-0234

A brief review of condition monitoring techniques for the induction motor

2019· review· en· W2943884623 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dileep Kumar, Jawaid Daudpoto

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction motorCondition monitoringControl engineeringComputer scienceFault (geology)Fault detection and isolationEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The induction motor is widely used in industry owing to its simple construction and low cost. In this paper, we present a state-of-the-art review of condition monitoring techniques for the induction motor. As the induction motor is used in many production processes, its uninterrupted and cost-effective functioning is of prime importance. Condition monitoring of the induction motor enables detection and prediction of different developing faults. Various techniques have been reported in literature for induction motor fault detection. In this paper, a brief review of these techniques is presented. Major induction motor faults and their sources are also described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207