MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943889593 · doi:10.23919/cleo.2019.8750609

Machine Learning Assisted Raman in Optofluidics for User-Independent Biofluid Diagnostics

2019· article· en· W2943889593 on OpenAlexaff
Emily E. Storey, Duxuan X. Wu, Amr S. Helmy

Bibliographic record

VenueConference on Lasers and Electro-Optics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptofluidicsMicrofluidicsRaman spectroscopyComputer scienceSensitivity (control systems)Raman scatteringSIGNAL (programming language)NanotechnologyMaterials scienceOpticsPhysicsEngineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a self-contained microfluidic Raman device which achieves signal enhancement of several orders of magnitude and machine-learning-driven analysis which facilitates diagnostically significant biofluid composition analysis, with a physiologically relevant sensitivity below © 2019 The Author(s)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference on Lasers and Electro-OpticsSame topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207