MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943896214 · doi:10.15353/cjo.78.459

Impending Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

2016· article· en· W2943896214 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michelle Steenbakkers

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentral retinal vein occlusionMedicineBlurred visionRetinalOphthalmologyAsymptomaticOptic nerveRetinal VeinOcclusionSurgeryMacular edema

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) may present with varied clinical manifestations, ranging from mild blurred vision and scattered retinal hemorrhages to severe vision loss, optic nerve swelling, pronounced retinal hemorrhages, collateral retinal vessel formation and neovascularization. Impending CRVO, also known as partial CRVO, is a relatively poorly-defined sub-classification of the CRVO condition. Those affected are either asymptomatic or may complain of mild, often transient episodes of blurring of vision and present with venous dilation and tortuosity but only a few widely scattered flame-shaped retinal hemorrhages. As an impending CRVO may be the prodromal phase of an acute CRVO, this diagnosis requires careful monitoring of the patient for progression. The following case outlines the differential diagnosis, sequelae and inter-professional management of an impending central retinal venous occlusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometrySame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207