MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943964483 · doi:10.1063/1.5110277

Three-dimensional tricritical spins and polymers

2020· article· en· W2943964483 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilResearch Institute for Mathematical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIsaac Newton Institute for Mathematical SciencesSimons Foundation
KeywordsTricritical pointSpinsRandom walkGaussianRenormalizationSelf-avoiding walkRenormalization groupSpin (aerodynamics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider two intimately related statistical mechanical problems on Z3: (i) the tricritical behavior of a model of classical unbounded n-component continuous spins with a triple-well single-spin potential (the |φ|6 model) and (ii) a random walk model of linear polymers with a three-body repulsion and two-body attraction at the tricritical theta point (critical point for the collapse transition), where repulsion and attraction effectively cancel. The polymer model is exactly equivalent to a supersymmetric spin model, which corresponds to the n = 0 version of the |φ|6 model. For the spin and polymer models, we identify the tricritical point and prove that the tricritical two-point function has Gaussian long-distance decay, namely, |x|−1. The proof is based on an extension of a rigorous renormalization group method that has been applied previously to analyze |φ|4 and weakly self-avoiding walk models on Z4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207