Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lancement d'une nouvelle campagne publicitaire palpitante auprès des consommateurs cet automneQu'est-ce Qui a mené à la campagne ouvrez les Yeux ?Plus tôt cette année, l'équipe d'Ogilvy a mené des entrevues auprès de membres de l'ACO et du CNEP, à l'échelle du pays.Selon les renseignements obtenus, nous avions manifestement besoin de créer un impact accru et de faire valoir le rôle des optométristes :• Il règne une préoccupation croissante à l'effet que d'autres provinces pourraient suivre la Colombie-Britannique dans la déréglementation de la distribution de lunettes et de lentilles cornéennes.• Les patients ne discernent pas clairement les différences entre les optométristes, les opticiens et les ophtalmologistes.• Le grand public n'est toujours pas bien informé sur les besoins d'une gestion régulière et soutenue de la santé des yeux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".