MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944088944 · doi:10.20431/2454-7999.0501005

Composition of Potential Heavy Metal Contaminants in Selected Liquid and Powdered Herbal Medicines Commonly Sold in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Nigeria

2019· article· en· W2944088944 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Medicinal Plants and Natural Products · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicHeavy Metals in Plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPort harcourtTraditional medicineHeavy metalsContaminationEnvironmental scienceMedicineEnvironmental chemistryChemistrySocioeconomicsBiologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four potential heavy metal contaminants (PHMC) were analyzed in nine ( The samples were processed, digested and analyzed in triplicate using flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (GBC Avanta PM6600 type). Concentration of heavy metals in liquid herbal products ranged from <0.001 -2.541 ppm (copper) and 0.041 -0.982 ppm (manganese), while chromium and cadmium were reportedly below detection limit in all test samples. Mean concentrations of copper and manganese in liquid herbal medicines were 0.38 0.79 ppm and 0.47 0.27 ppm respectively. On the other hand, the powdered herbs depicted heavy metal concentrations ranging from 0.049 -0.143 ppm (chromium), 0.437 -2.587 ppm (cadmium), while copper and manganese were reportedly below instrument detection limit. Mean concentrations of chromium and cadmium in finished powdered herbal products were 0.108 0.045 ppm and 1.245 0.815 ppm respectively. Apart from cadmium that exceeded WHO recommended limit in powdered herbal products, all other heavy metal contaminants were observed to be within recommended WHO limits and levels established by countries like Canada and Singapore. There was marked significant variation (P<0.05) in the concentration of copper and manganese amongst the various liquid herbal medicines that were tested. Similarly, the finished powdered herbal products showed significant variation (P<0.05) in concentrations of chromium and cadmium. Overall, the significant concentration of cadmium found in herbs of powdered form which are sold within the Port Harcourt metropolis is alarming and may be responsible for the high occurrence of kidney and liver health cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it