MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944153809 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.190477

Abortion services in Canada: access and safety

2019· letter· en· W2944153809 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Laura Schummers, Wendy V. Norman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchProvincial Health Services AuthorityMichael Smith Health Research BCPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsAbortionMedicineKey (lock)GynecologyFamily medicineMedical emergencyPregnancyComputer securityComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[See related article at [www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.181288][2]][2] KEY POINTS In linked research, Liu and colleagues[1][2] analyzed Ontario administrative health data to investigate the safety of surgical abortion. Their meticulous analysis found that, in Ontario, surgical abortions were

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207