Integrative modeling of performance deterioration and maintenance effectiveness for infrastructure assets with missing condition data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deterioration modeling is an important analytical component in infrastructure asset management. It concerns the prediction of performance and remaining service life of assets of different designs under omnifarious working environments. For long-term prediction, it also requires to characterize maintenance effectiveness because maintenance activities do not necessarily bring an asset to a completely renewed status. Deterioration modeling research has for decades been largely focusing on the modeling of the natural deterioration process per se, whereas the modeling of maintenance effectiveness is only a recent focus of investigation, mainly in pavement research. In practice, the asset conditions immediately before and after a given maintenance treatment both are not often known. This has made the modeling of maintenance effectiveness and long-term deterioration prediction a challenging task. To bridge the gap, this paper presents a novel approach that integrates the modeling of deterioration and maintenance effectiveness into one process. The natural deterioration of asset performance is modeled as a continuous-time Markov chain, whereas the effectiveness of a maintenance measure is modeled as a discrete-time Markov chain. To account for missing condition data before and after the maintenance event, the paper also develops a robust statistical method based on Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. A real-life case study on a municipal sewer pipe system is carried out for demonstration of the proposed integrated modeling approach. The functional deterioration of sewer pipes and the effectiveness of flushing operations that target to bring flow capacity to intact state are modeled. Influences of pipe length, diameter, slope, and sewershed area are examined. The present work is a valuable step toward development of evidence-based risk-informed asset management framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".