MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944175434 · doi:10.1111/cup.13491

Cutaneous plasmacytosis and multinucleate cell angiohistiocytoma‐like lesion in a patient with hepatitis B: A fortuitous triad?

2019· article· en· W2944175434 on OpenAlexaff
Simon F. Roy, Feras M. Ghazawi, Diane Tran, Danielle Bouffard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Pathology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmacytosisPathologyMedicineBiopsyPapuleLesionBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 28-year-old woman of Chinese descent, with congenital chronic hepatitis B presented with a 7-year history of erythematous-brown papules and plaques on her groins, axillae, and forehead. A first skin biopsy showed findings consistent with two concomitant, yet highly uncommon cutaneous diseases. The presence of lymphoid nodules with germinal centers and clustered polyclonal plasma cells was consistent with cutaneous plasmocytosis. Second, a diffuse proliferation of non-atypical small vessels (CD31+, CD34+, and HHV8-) in a hypercellular stroma peppered with angulated giant cells (CD163+, CD68-) was suggestive of multinucleate cell angiohistiocytoma (MCAH). Interestingly, the second biopsy of a different plaque on the forehead showed only plasmacytosis and the clinical appearance of both plaques and papules alluded to the distinct presence of both concurrent entities. We speculate the immune modulating effects of chronic hepatitis B may have led to a polyclonal plasmacytic proliferation within the dermis. Furthermore, MCAH has been reported in conjunction with other inflammatory skin diseases such as hidradenitis suppurativa and as such we propose that the MCAH lesion in our case may have arisen as a secondary, reactive process to the cutaneous plasmacytosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous PathologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207