Les problématiques liées à la participation sociale et à l’appropriation du domicile : les identifier dans le cadre du relogement et d'un accompagnement en ergothérapie de personnes sans domicile fixe et en situation de handicap psychique.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment les ergotherapeutes interviennent-ils aupres des personnes en situation de handicap psychique et sans domicile fixe ? Les pratiques decrites sont en cours d’experimentation ou de developpement dans les pays anglo-saxons (Canada, Australie, Etats Unis) et tres peu documentees en France, cette recherche, menee grâce a la methode clinique, a pour objectif d’identifier les problematiques de ce public dans un contexte ou les ergotherapeutes pourraient intervenir ; celui du relogement, l'exploration de la participation sociale et de l'appropriation du domicile, grâce a un entretien soumis a une personne relogee recemment, permet de mettre en relief les problematiques faisant obstacle au relogement, cette recherche donne des arguments quant au role de l'ergotherapeute dans les equipes intervenant dans le cadre du relogement et du maintien de ce public dans le nouveau domicile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".