MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944209481 · doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2019.3.003

Flexible job-shop scheduling with learning and forgetting effect by Multi-Agent System

2019· article· en· W2944209481 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForgettingJob shopComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Job shop schedulingIndustrial engineeringOperations managementOperations researchFlow shop schedulingEngineeringPsychologyOperating systemCognitive psychologySchedule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The processing time of the machine is assumed fixed in several studies. In many real industrial applications, the processing time is affected by learning and forgetting effects. This research proposes a scheduling approach to support a manufacturing system under learning/forgetting effect. The approach is supported by a Multi-Agent System to perform the scheduling activities in a quasi-real-time and in general manufacturing systems. A simulation environment is developed to test the proposed approach and the results are compared with a benchmark model for evaluating several performance measures of the manufacturing system. The simulation results highlight how the proposed approach improves all the performance measures under different conditions of inter-arrival time, learning and forgetting rates. A complete Analysis of the Variance highlights the main effects on the performance measures to support the decision maker of the manufacturing system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it