On Countermeasures of Pilot Spoofing Attack in Massive MIMO Systems: A Double Channel Training Based Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate secure communication in a massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system with multiple users and multiple eavesdroppers (Eve) under both pilot spoofing attack (PSA) and uplink jamming. Specifically, Eve impairs the normal channel estimation by sending identical pilot sequences with the legitimate users. Based on the impaired channel estimation, the base station adopts linear processing schemes for uplink data reception, which is jammed by Eve, and downlink confidential information transmission. We first evaluate the impact of the PSA on the achievable rate with linear processing, and then propose a double channel training based scheme to combat PSA. By using the channel estimation difference in two training phases, the presence of the PSA can be detected and accurate legitimate channel estimation can be obtained by removing the effect of Eve's channel. Furthermore, we analyze the channel estimation errors and derive a closed-form expression of the minimum mean square error precoding scheme to maximize the minimum achievable secrecy rate, which outperforms the conventional linear precoding counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".