MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944231641 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2018-0113

Study of thermoelastic damping in fully clamped bilayered rectangular microplate resonators based on three-dimensional heat conduction

2019· article· en· W2944231641 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaopeng Li, Linlin Wang, Wujiu Pan, Zemin Yang, Jinchi Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsThermoelastic dampingMaterials scienceDissipationThermal conductionResonatorWork (physics)MechanicsMagnetic dampingThermalStructural engineeringPhysicsAcousticsComposite materialThermodynamicsVibrationEngineeringOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the condition that microresonators work at room temperature or vaccum, thermoelastic damping is one of the main mechanisms of energy dissipation. Thermoelastic damping caused by the internal consumption of thermoelastic materials has always prevented the improvement of the quality of microresonators. In this paper, the theoretical model of thermoelastic damping in fully clamped bilayered plate microresonators based on the theory of three-dimensional heat conduction is first established and then verified to be equivalent to the previous single-layer model or not through the formula derivation. Analysis on thermoelastic damping at the first-order frequency where microresonators usually work is carried out afterwards. The differences of thermoelastic damping in the present three-dimensional model with different materials are investigated, including the convergence speed and the value of thermoelastic damping with different thicknesses. Then, with different lengths, widths, and thicknesses, but the same combination of materials, the thermoelastic damping is investigated in the present model. Furthermore, the present bilayered model is compared with the single-layer model to investigate their equivalent relationship. Finally, the present three-dimensional model is compared with the one-dimensional model and FEM models to investigate its feasibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207