Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This discussion was moderated by Robyn J. Barst, MD, Professor of Pediatrics, Divisions of Pediatric Cardiology at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and Cornell Medical Center, and Director of New York Presbyterian Pulmonary Hypertension Center at Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. Panel members included Jeffrey R. Fineman, MD, Pediatric Critical Care Specialist and Associate Investigator of the Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco; John Granton, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto, Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Programme, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario; Michael A. Gatzoulis, MD, PhD, Professor of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Disease, and Consultant Cardiologist and Director of the Adult Congenital Heart Centre at the Royal Brompton Hospital and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK; and Richard A. Krasuski, MD, Director of Adult Congenital Heart Disease Services, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".