MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944253564 · doi:10.15353/cjo.79.296

Optometric Management of a Third Nerve Palsy in a Prison Setting

2017· article· en· W2944253564 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Benoît Tousignant

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationPrisonEtiologyRehabilitationIntensive care medicineMultidisciplinary approachPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPediatricsPhysical therapyPsychiatryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Third nerve palsy (TNP) is a neuro-ophthalmic condition that is likely to be encountered by optometrists in various clinical settings. It affects extraocular muscles and may impair eyelid and pupil functions to various degrees. Its aetiology in adults is often linked to compressive lesions of the central nervous system or to vascular ischemic causes from systemic disease such as diabetes and hypertension. This case report presents the management of a TNP in a multidisciplinary Canadian prison setting, where the patient population is often underserved. Current practices for neuroimaging cases of TNP in a conventional clinical setting are pre-sented. The challenges and advantages of management of TNP in a prison setting are discussed, highlighting the particularities of caring for the vul-nerable patient population in the prison setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometrySame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207