La vie rêvée des empires : Amérindiens et Européens en Nouvelle-France selon David Hackett Fischer*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il s’agit dans cet article d’analyser la place accordée aux Autochtones dans Le rêve de Champlain , la biographie que l’historien David Hackett Fischer consacre à Samuel de Champlain. Selon Fischer, Champlain a non seulement fait preuve d’un esprit de tolérance et d’ouverture envers les Amérindiens, mais il a bâti son projet colonial autour de cet esprit. La Nouvelle-France aurait donc incarné une orientation de coexistence pacifique entre colonisateurs et Autochtones unique à travers les Amériques. En situant l’argument de Fischer dans le contexte de l’historiographie récente sur les Autochtones et les empires, l’article avance que Le rêve de Champlain trace un portrait réducteur et anachronique des rapports entretenus par Champlain avec les Amérindiens. Enfin, l’article étudie la réception du livre au Canada, où il a été instrumentalisé dans un débat sur la place des Autochtones dans le Canada aujourd’hui.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".