MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944276509 · doi:10.1158/1557-3265.tcm17-b30

Abstract B30: PTEN loss associates with type I and II IFN response in prostate cancer

2018· article· en· W2944276509 on OpenAlexaff
Thiago Vidotto, Jeremy A. Squire, Madhuri Koti

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPTENBiologyProstate cancerCancer researchTumor microenvironmentCancerTranscriptomeImmune systemGeneGene expressionImmunologyPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayGeneticsSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract PTEN gene deletion and protein loss occurs in 20-30% of prostate cancer (PCa) cases and leads to poor disease outcome. Loss of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene activates the PI3 kinase pathway and also appears to alter cellular interferon (IFN) responses. Recent evidence highlights the role of inflammation in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its association with PCa disease progression. It is thus important to establish whether IFN response inflammatory biomarkers in PCa tumors are predictive of disease outcome in the context of PTEN status. The aim of this study is to determine if PTEN genomic and protein loss is associated with IFN response in the TME. We performed an in silico analysis of genomic and corresponding transcriptomic profiles PCa tumors (n=493) from the Genomic Data Commons (GDC) cohort to identify significant alterations in immune response pathways when PTEN was lost. Nexus Copy Number, v8.0 (BioDiscovery, Santa-Clara, CA, USA) was used for normalization, segmentation, and identification of corresponding copy number events of all genomic files in the GDC cohort. The GDC RNAseq dataset comprises the expression of 20,532 genes that were filtered using standard thresholds from Nexus Expression 3.0 (BioDiscovery, Santa-Clara, CA, USA). The filtering resulted in 6081 genes. Genes of interest were identified using the Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Function in Nexus Expression 3.0 with the keywords “Immune” and “Inflammatory” (http://geneontology.org/). Of the 449 selected immune genes, 124 (28%) were differentially expressed when the PTEN-loss group was compared to the PTEN-intact group. DAVID enrichment analysis showed upregulation of 16 pathways, in which three were directly associated with immune and inflammatory responses, including retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I-like) receptor signaling pathway (P<0.0001), chemokine signaling pathway (P<0.0001), and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway (P<0.0001). In addition, we identified ten downregulated pathways, including cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction pathway (P<0.003) and intestinal immune network for IgA production pathway (P<0.006). We then selected the 25 most differentially expressed genes from the three upregulated and two downregulated pathways described above to compare the cohort of 218 prostate cancer tumors from MSKCC (in which 11% had PTEN loss) to the GDC cohort. The direction of differential gene expression was identical for 19/25 (76%) genes, in both cohorts having similarly altered PTEN-dependent changes in expression of immune and inflammatory response genes. The 25 most differentially expressed genes were associated directly with type I and II IFN response, indicating that PTEN loss affects the TME probably through the IRF3-IFN axis. Collectively, our findings based on in silico studies suggest that PCa with PTEN loss exhibits dysregulated Type I and II IFN response that permits progression to an aggressive disease phenotype. Future investigations will be required to define the mechanisms underlying these correlations, and their role in PCa disease progression so that inflammation biomarker can be therapeutically exploited using immunotherapies. Citation Format: Thiago Vidotto, Jeremy Andrew Squire, Madhuri Koti. PTEN loss associates with type I and II IFN response in prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR International Conference held in cooperation with the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) on Translational Cancer Medicine; May 4-6, 2017; São Paulo, Brazil. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(1_Suppl):Abstract nr B30.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207