MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944282914

The Roles and Representation of Jewish Women in Zeev Jawitz' Writings

2018· article· en· W2944282914 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Asaf Yedidya

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen in Judaism A Multidisciplinary e-Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJudaismIdeal (ethics)Representation (politics)RomanceHebrewSociologyHebrew BiblePerceptionLiteratureReligious studiesGender studiesHistoryPhilosophyAestheticsLawEpistemologyTheologyArtPolitical scienceBiblical studiesPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the roles of Jewish women in Zeev Jawitz' Writings. His perception was influenced by both traditional and masskilic values, but his most influential source was the Hebrew Bible. Jawitz believed that the romantic ideal of love between man and woman should form the basis for marriage, instead of a match based on social and financial interests, as was customary in traditional Jewish society and among the higher classes. In addition, he highlighted traditional egalitarian aspects of men and women in Judaism, and related to famous women in the Hebrew Bible: Miriam, Dvora, and Hannah, not as the exception but as the rule. However, he was completely committed to Halakha and objected to breaching its explicit rules. Jawitz was the first religious Zionist leader and thinker, and one of the first Orthodox scholars, to deal seriously with this issue. Although his view is not systematic – probably because of the literary form of his presentation – he influenced his religious Zionist audience by introducing new and egalitarian approaches towards Jewish women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen in Judaism A Multidisciplinary e-JournalSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207