Evidence of transcription at polyT short tandem repeats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Using the Cap Analysis of Gene Expression technology, the FANTOM5 consortium provided one of the most comprehensive maps of Transcription Start Sites (TSSs) in several species. Strikingly, ~72% of them could not be assigned to a specific gene and initiate at unconventional regions, outside promoters or enhancers. Results Here, we probe these unassigned TSSs and show that, in all species studied, a significant fraction of CAGE peaks initiate at short tandem repeats (STRs) corresponding to homopolymers of thymidines (T). Additional analyse confirm that these CAGEs are truly associated with transcriptionally active chromatin marks. Furthermore, we train a sequence-based deep learning model able to predict CAGE signal at T STRs with high accuracy (~81%) Extracting features learned by this model reveals that transcription at T STRs is mostly directed by STR length but also instructions lying in the downstream sequence. Excitingly, our model also predicts that genetic variants linked to human diseases affect this STR-associated transcription. Conclusions Together, our results extend the repertoire of non-coding transcription associated with DNA tandem repeats and complexify STR polymorphism. We also provide a new metric that can be considered in future studies of STR-related complex traits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".