Abstract ES4-2: Treatment morbidity and quality of life considerations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Partial breast irradiation was introduced to reduce treatment times, improve convenience of radiotherapy and reduce radiation exposure to the breast and surrounding normal tissues. A number of techniques have been developed including interstitial brachytherapy, single catheter-based brachytherapy, intraoperative therapy, and 3 dimensional conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy. The toxicity profile of partial breast irradiation has been dependent on the different techniques used. In general acute toxicity has been less than that observed with whole breast irradiation, particularly for intraoperative approaches where radiotherapy is delivered at the time of breast conserving surgery. Reports of late toxicity have varied. The majority of trials have observed no increase in late toxicity with interstitial brachytherapy and intraoperative treatment when compared to whole breast irradiation. Some studies of 3D conformal radiotherapy have reported an increase in late radiation toxicity such as telangiectasia of the skin and subcutaneous fibrosis of the breast. Limited data are available on cosmetic outcome and quality of life. Again, results to date have varied with some studies reporting similar cosmetic results and others indicating an increase in adverse cosmesis with partial breast irradiation when compared to whole breast irradiation. This presentation will review mature results from completed trials and discuss radiobiological inferences and implications for clinical decision making. Citation Format: Whelan T. Treatment morbidity and quality of life considerations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr ES4-2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".