PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA SECARA INDIVIDUAL OLEH DEWAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA PBB SUATU TINJAUAN TERHADAP TAHANAN RUMAH AUNG SAN SUU KYI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Munculnya era baru Dewan HAM sebagai pengganti dari Komisi HAM PBB memiliki fungsi pokok ialah sebagai pengawas yang membongkar kasus-kasus pelanggaran HAM di muka bumi. Salah satu peran Dewan HAM PBB yang dibentuk sejak tahun 2006 ialah menjamin HAM secara individu terhadap tahanan rumah Aung San Suu Kyi, seorang tokoh pro-demokrasi di Myanmar.Penahanan dan pelanggaran HAM yang terjadi pada Suu Kyi telah melanggar pasal 9, 10, dan 19 UDHR, yakni bahwa seseorang berhak atas kebebasan untuk mengemukakan pendapat, larangan atas penangkapan sewenang-wenang hingga memiliki hak atas pengadilan yang adil dalam pasal 10. Sedangkan dalam ICCPR juga terdapat ketentuan mengenai pelanggaran yang dilakukan Myanmar terhadap Aung San Suu Kyi pada pasal 9 angka (1) tentang penahanan sewenang-wenang.Melalui mekanisme Universal Periodic Review Dewan HAM, UPR 10th di Geneva, 24 Januari – 4 Februari 2011 par. 29 menyatakan agar pemerintah Myanmar segera membebaskan Aung San Suu Kyi dari tahanan rumahnya.Hal tersebut mengisyaratkan bahwa negara-negara tidak lagi dapat berlindung di balik kedaulatan teritorialnya atas pelanggaran hak asasi manusia yang terjadi di wilayah negaranya, termasuk Myanmar. Kata Kunci : Hak Asasi Manusia, Individu, Dewan HAM PBB, Aung San Suu Kyi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".